For most tiny businesses, migrating into the cloud has moved out of the base of the to-do list to the exact top. Why the sudden rush to make a move? Many businesses have viewed as prices were reduced by their competitors by adopting the cloud and invested the savings in innovations that helped increase their business. To play catch-up adopters are scrambling to get to the cloud. However, many find themselves torn over whether to maintain their infrastructure at the cloud or on-site in doing this.

Option 1: On-Site Infrastructure

First and foremost, it is important to understand that on-premise infrastructure (occasionally referred to as a private cloud) is not the cloud as we know it; the true intention of this cloud is that colocation hosting is scalable and elastic, without having to purchase additional hardware. When preserving an individual’s own infrastructure, an increase in capacity will need more equipment. So why do some companies keep their servers on-site? For one, they so are leery about trusting a third party to keep their sensitive data, and may have safety concerns. They may feel daunted by the closeness of the information that is stored.

colocation hosting

However, servers onsite can pose numerous challenges:

Virtual safety. Despite understanding, cloud-based infrastructure that is true is more secure. This is because most are maintained by safety experts who understand cloud security difficulties, and how to mitigate them.

Physical safety. Most organizations do not possess the same safety features which are offered by third-party data centres, leaving their information vulnerable to many different dangers from Mother Nature or thieves.

Compliance. For keeping compliance via on-premise hardware parameters are largely than in the cloud it can be costly and time-consuming to do so, requiring an organization to employ. Downtime affects performance–for employees and customers. While a VPC or public cloud supplier can typically have a company up and running only seconds or minutes after an event, an internal IT team could take hours to find all systems operating.

Option 2: Colocation

Colocation is when a company houses its physical servers at a third-party data center. The equipment is the company’s own hardware, but they receive the benefit of having their servers are managed by an colo provider every day, providing the power and cooling system, and managing a number of the connectivity and maintenance problems. Companies utilizing colo are basically renting the utilities needed to operate them, the infrastructure, as well as rack space.

One major benefit of colocation is that if a company decides it wants to bring back its infrastructure , or transfer it into another colocation facility, migration is simple; moving their server(s) is all that’s necessary.

Of course, not all businesses wish to obtain their own units and take the hit of a large capital expenditure. Instead, they may find the space required to house them, as well as a provider keen to rent servers that are physical. Migrating in this situation might be more difficult since the colo provider owns the hardware, not the company. Make sure you review your service level agreement (SLA) carefully. Want to learn about six benefits of colocation? Read our story 6 Advantages of Using a Colocation Facility.